Papers with automatic prompt optimization methods
Agent-GWO: Collaborative Agents for Dynamic Prompt Optimization in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xudong Wang, Chaoning Zhang, Chenghao Li, Shuxu Chen, Qigan Sun, Jiaquan Zhang, Fachrina Dewi Puspitasari, Tae-Ho Kim, Jiwei Wei, Malu Zhang, Guoqing Wang, Yang Yang, Heng Tao Shen
| Challenge: | Existing automatic prompt optimization methods fail to optimize prompts and decoding hyperparameters within a unified framework to achieve stable global improvements. |
| Approach: | They propose a dynamic prompt optimization framework for complex reasoning that unifies prompt templates and decodes hyperparameters as inheritable agent configurations. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on multiple mathematical and hybrid reasoning benchmarks show that Agent-GWO improves accuracy and stability over existing prompt optimization methods. |
Direct Behavior Optimization: Unlocking the Potential of Lightweight LLMs (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing prompt optimization methods rely on extensive manual effort or meta-cognitive abilities, making them less effective for LwLLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a direct behavior optimization parameter that transforms the optimization of complex prompts into discrete, quantifiable execution sequences using a gradient-free Monte Carlo Tree Search. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms current prompt optimization methods on seven challenging tasks where state-of-the-art LLMs excel but LwLLMs generally underperform. |
HPSS: Heuristic Prompting Strategy Search for LLM Evaluators (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Bosi Wen, Pei Ke, Yufei Sun, Cunxiang Wang, Xiaotao Gu, Jinfeng Zhou, Jie Tang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Existing efforts to optimize text evaluation prompts neglect the combinatorial impact of multiple factors, leading to insufficient optimization of the evaluation pipeline. |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate 8 key factors for evaluation prompts and integrate them into an algorithm that searches for well-behaved prompting strategies for LLM evaluators. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods and human-designed evaluation prompts on four evaluation tasks. |